Legislation Details

File #: 14-1011    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 1/7/2014 In control: Board of Sedgwick County Commissioners
On agenda: 1/15/2014 Final action: 1/15/2014
Title: RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF RETAINING THE MORTGAGE REGISTRATION FEE, AS PROVIDED IN K.S.A. 79-3102. Presented by: Kristi Zukovich, Director, Sedgwick County Communications and Community Initiatives. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the resolution.
Attachments: 1. Mortgage Registration Fee Resolution
Title
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF RETAINING THE MORTGAGE REGISTRATION FEE, AS PROVIDED IN K.S.A. 79-3102.
Presented by: Kristi Zukovich, Director, Sedgwick County Communications and Community Initiatives.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the resolution.
 
Body
Kansas has charged a fee on the recording of mortgages for nearly 100 years.  It has been a significant source of funding for local governments and has been upheld by the courts as a valid tax. In 1915 Legislation was created and signed by the government for a Mortgage Registration Fee.  Since 1925 the current Mortgage Registration fee has been $.25 per 100. In 1990, a $.01 was added for the Heritage Trust Fund.  The Mortgage Registration Fee was designed from the beginning to be a revenue stream for the county.  Without the registration service fee, counties would not have the revenue to fund the mortgage registration process; a process which involves the Register of Deeds, County Clerk, Treasurer and Appraisers Offices.  
 
Alternatives:
Financial Considerations: The mortgage registration fee produced $6.3-million of revenue to fund general operations of the county in 2013, and has ranged from $5.4-million to $8.7-million every year since 2003.  It accounts for  about 5% of total yearly General Fund revenue.  The General Fund is the source of funding for the Sheriff ($51.5-million), other public safety operations (approximately $38-million), public works ($15.5-million), and other critical services.  The loss of 5% of General Fund revenue would require some combination of these responses:  reduce or eliminate county services equal to as much as 5% of total General Fund spending, or increase local property taxes as much as $6.3-million, which would require up to a 5% increase of the property tax rate.
Legal Considerations:
Policy Considerations:
Outside Attendees:
Multimedia Presentation:
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.